If we were to make a comparison between the Motorola E and the Samsung Galaxy S5, we would say without hesitation that Galaxy S5 would win in practically every test.
The conclusion would be swift because Moto E is a smartphone with modest settings, and Galaxy S5 has the most advanced settings a smartphone can have.
O Moto E has a processor dual-core, 1,2 GHz; while the Galaxy S5 is a quad-core with twice the frequency of the Moto E, 2,5 GHz. There is still the issue of RAM: 2 GB of Galaxy S5 Vs 1 GB of Motorola Moto E.
However, a test came to prove that more memory and processor do not define the real functioning of a smartphone, since the two smartphones have different software.
Samsung uses the interface TouchWiz, an altered version of Android, slower than the original version. Motorola uses almost pure Android, with minor changes. This difference makes apps on Moto E open faster and transitions are smoother.
You have to look carefully to notice the differences. But of course we can not Galaxy S5 to be worse than the Moto E, as it comfortably beat the Motorola smartphone on many other issues.
But is not this an incentive for Samsung to release versions of its smartphones with pure Android?
[su_spoiler title = ”See more differences between Moto E and Galaxy S5 ″ style =” fancy ”anchor =” glass ”]
[/ Su_spoiler]
[Via]: 9to5Google
